-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 577
Bring KAL up to date and enable new linters #2554
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Hello @JoelSpeed! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api: |
| policy: SuggestFix | ||
| uniqueMarkers: | ||
| namingconventions: | ||
| conventions: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if it would make sense to add one for https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/dev-guide/api-conventions.md#use-resource-name-rather-than-kind-in-object-references ?
I think this could have a violation matcher that catches Kind naming and suggest a fix that it should be Resource instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good shout
| usePatchStrategy: Ignore | ||
| useProtobuf: Ignore | ||
| forbiddenmarkers: | ||
| markers: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
kubebuilder:validation:Pattern as we prefer using CEL expressions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
kubebuilder:validation:UniqueItems as well? IIRC this marker doesn't actually work right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah those are both good suggestions
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: everettraven The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/verified by CI checks |
|
@JoelSpeed: This PR has been marked as verified by In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@JoelSpeed: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
This updates KAL and enables a few new linters
metav1.Duration+nullabletag